Support Small Studios, Not AI

Purple and beige hedgehog typing on a computer keyboard at a cluttered desk, surrounded by reminder post it notes, including one checklist on which the only word checked is "nothing." Pink No, Mine! Studios logo in bottom right hand corner.

As an indie artist, I am all about making and protecting original art. I do not support generative AI. Feeding artists’ work into AI training models without consent and payment is theft. I would much rather go to a museum filled with stick figures drawn by crayon (and I have) than support AI generated art. You can create art that makes a huge impact in this world without relying on toxic technology and stealing work from others.

Meta’s policies regarding many topics are infuriating and gross, and its AI practices are no exception. Supposedly, the company removed language regarding scraping websites for content from the website a few days ago (https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/17/meta-removes-language-that-raised-scraping-and-ai-training-concerns/), but the rollout of Muse is not high on my list for tools I want to support. As a protective measure, I have started removing my work from Facebook, Instagram, and Threads.

Continuing to use YouTube has also been challenging in that there are reports about videos being run through AI filters without creator consent prior to upload. Unfortunately, I have noticed some quality concerns when uploading my work.

I hope that Bluesky does not follow in the steps of the other social media giants; I want to connect with others AND I want to stay true to my moral code. It shouldn’t be so hard to do both. For now, I am keeping both my personal account (@suzanneskaar) and studio account (@nominestudios) on Bluesky and the studio page on YouTube. Warning: I am unabashedly political on my personal accounts: I like human and environmental rights. I want people to thrive and work together to live in an inclusive society. Super shocking, I know.

While politics may not be so overt on my studio page, I generously sprinkle them throughout my work, including drawings and animations of ghosts and dinosaurs. If you zoom in close enough on any of my illustrations and squint hard enough, you just might see the entire communist manifesto written out in pixels followed by criticism of Karl Marx for relying on his wife Jenny von Westphalen’s unpaid labor and unrecognized contributions.

I digress.

If you would like to support this business and follow along for new updates, the best thing you can do is hit the follow button on the website’s front page so No, Mine! Studios stays in your feed. I will try not to be annoying with the blog posts. Unless you like being annoyed, in which case, let me know in the comments.

I am also highly interested in hearing other creatives’ advice for balancing protecting one’s work and making it available to the public. What are your studio’s best practices?

Suz

Stop Normalizing Charging Artists Submission Fees

“If all the other galleries charged submission fees to jump off a bridge, would you?”

“How much is the normal submission fee to jump off the bridge? Will artists have to pay for the bungee cords and protective gear on top of the application fee? Would it be during Art Walk? Will there be a no-host bar?”

An online discussion over the weekend about the ethics of charging artists submission fees led to some misogynist and ableist attacks on my intelligence, mental health, and character, as well as what would seem to be a not-so-veiled threat. So of course, I decided to talk about the practice here.

Artists shouldn’t pay submission fees to have work considered.

Not if the work will be seen by “so many people,” not if “other galleries are charging fees,” and not if accepted artists will receive some kind of perk that can be purchased from that business any other time of the year for the same amount of money as the submission fee.

Other authors have already done excellent jobs on explaining how submission fees frontload the risk of shows onto artists. Martha Knox gives a detailed breakdown on the subject, particularly how the charging of fees maintains the status quo of who is represented in the art world. Please read her article, aptly named “Stop Charging and Paying Artist Submission Fees.”  The site Art Business Info. for Artists covers the phenomenon of “vanity galleries” — galleries which make their money off of artists and not actually selling artists’ work. If you’re just starting out as an artist, or if you know someone who is struggling in this field, please, please read their page for a great list of red flags.

Instead of repeating the information found on these sites, here are resources for finding arts organizations that don’t charge submission fees.

Seattle-based Artist Trust recently revised their opportunities website to list whether an organization charges submission fees up front. They also have a number of grants available for Washington-based artists, as well as assistance for those interested in learning how to apply for said grants.  

Submittable’s advanced search option allows creators to exclude results with fees. If you haven’t used it before, click the “Sign In” button to create a free account.

An international site that I have had luck with in the past for writing opportunities is the UK-based Writers HQ. Not only do they list the compensation writers can expect to receive, “Writers’ HQ will now only be accepting listings from organisations offering accessible submission opportunities for low-income writers.” Many of the opportunities listed are free.

Submission fees are exploitative. Stop normalizing them, and start creating spaces for more artists to thrive.

Suzanne

I try to share resources as I find them. If this kind of advice is helpful, please let me know either in the comments or by email (nominestudios@gmail.com), and I’ll make it a more regular feature on the blog.

Throwback to 2006 Equilibrium Artist Collective first show “Eye Full.” Guest artists were invited to join us at each collective pop-up event, over 100 attendees each event, and not a single submission fee was charged to artists. First “Moped Guy” painting (Suzanne Skaar, 2006) on display in top right corner of background.

Update: Standing up to Santa

I don’t know how permanent this is or if I will have to fight this fight again, but as of this morning, this:

912E6C9F-44BC-4680-A21F-AEFF419C8627

changed to this:

5A59439E-A24D-4729-8B28-9F658747CA25

Thank you to those who took the time to write on my behalf. I’m not sure whether the link was taken down by Facebook or the Knights of the Pythias. If it was the latter, it’s sad that the individual was so bent on retaliation against a woman he dated that he’d rather erase any trace of her contributions from a nonprofit organization than credit her and get permission to use photos before posting. 

I am still waiting for the KOP leadership to get back to me with an apology for making a volunteer jump through so many hoops for her own intellectual property, and to confirm what steps will be done to protect others should they be sexually harassed. It’s 2019: historical societies shouldn’t still be treating women like it’s the Dark Ages.